How to Prepare Your Portfolio for Roles at Analytics Scaleups Like ClickHouse

Struggling to prove you can handle ClickHouse-scale workloads? Build a portfolio that speaks the language of analytics scaleups

Hiring managers at analytics startups and scaleups (ClickHouse, yours truly included) no longer accept generic dashboards or toy ETL scripts. They want evidence you can design, ingest, query, and troubleshoot high-throughput OLAP systems under production constraints: millions of rows/sec, concurrent analytical queries, cost-aware storage, and predictable latency. This guide gives you concrete project blueprints, datasets, benchmark templates, and interview artifacts that justify hiring you for data engineering and analytics roles in 2026.

Why this matters now (2026 context)

Analytics platforms exploded in 2024–2026: enterprise adoption of cloud-native OLAP, ClickHouse’s continued growth and large funding rounds, and wider use of streaming telemetry mean more companies need engineers who can operate at scale. ClickHouse raised a major funding round in late 2025–early 2026 and scaleups are hiring aggressively for engineers who can deliver low-latency, high-concurrency analytics. Recruiters screen portfolios for:

• Evidence of handling ingestion at scale
• Realistic benchmarks vs. paper claims
• Thoughtful schema and index design for MergeTree families
• Operational artifacts: runbooks, dashboards, CI, and Terraform manifests

What hiring teams actually look for (short list)

1. Reproducible benchmarks with scripts to run end-to-end tests
2. Production-ready ingestion pipelines (Kafka, CDC, or S3-based) with backpressure handling
3. Schema and query design that shows cost/latency tradeoffs
4. Monitoring and alerting demonstrating operational readiness
5. Incident stories (postmortems or troubleshooting notes) showing system thinking

Portfolio format that gets interviews

• A public GitHub repo with a single-click demo (Docker Compose or Helm + k8s manifests)
• Step-by-step README with dataset download, schema create, and benchmark run
• Screenshots & short screencast (2–4 minutes) of the system running under load
• PDF one-pager summarizing outcomes: QPS, latency p50/p95/p99, storage cost, and lessons
• Optional: A blog post explaining architectural choices aimed at non-experts

Project ideas that prove you can handle ClickHouse-scale OLAP

1. Realtime Ad Analytics Pipeline (Cold + Hot path)

Why it matters: advertising analytics are high-cardinality, high-ingestion, and latency-sensitive—perfect for demonstrating MergeTree tuning, materialized views, and tiered storage.

• Datasets: Simulate ad impression/click streams using open datasets like AdTraffic traces or generate synthetic events with user_id cardinality >10M.
• Ingestion: Kafka producer -> Kafka Connect or Flink for enrichment -> ClickHouse Kafka engine into a MergeTree for the hot path and periodic batch inserts into cold storage (S3).
• Key queries to implement: real-time dashboards (1m rollups), attribution joins, user funnel queries across sessions.
• Benchmarks: Ingest 100k-1M rows/sec sustained; measure p50/p95/p99 of 1-minute window aggregations under 100 concurrent queries.
• Artifacts: Helm chart, Docker Compose, Grafana dashboards, runbook for node failover and data recovery.

2. Time-series Metrics Aggregator

Why it matters: demonstrates ability to compress, aggregate, and query high-cardinality time-series efficiently, including TTL policies and tiering.

• Datasets: Prometheus samples (exporter sim) or the OpenTSDB dataset; scale dimensions to simulate IoT devices.
• Schema: Use MergeTree with ORDER BY (device_id, timestamp) or SummingMergeTree/AggregatingMergeTree for pre-aggregated metrics.
• Key features: TTL for raw data to migrate to cheaper storage; materialized views for hourly/day aggregates; approximate quantiles for percentile queries.
• Benchmarks: Insert at 200k rows/sec with retention policies; query 30-day rollups with sub-second p95.

3. Massive Join and Rollup: GitHub Archive Analytics

Why it matters: joins at scale expose partitioning, distributed joins, and memory limits—critical interview topics.

• Datasets: GitHub Archive events or public GitHub event dumps; enrich with user metadata.
• Workload: Complex joins (events -> users -> repos) with GROUP BYs and window functions.
• Design: Use Distributed tables, tune join_algorithm settings, test local shuffling vs. replicated lookups.
• Benchmarks: Vary concurrency and measure how join strategy and cluster size impact p95 latency and memory.

4. Log Analytics with Cost-aware Storage

Why it matters: logs are huge and require lifecycle policies; demonstrate ability to balance query speed and storage cost.

• Datasets: Large public log archives, or generate with OpenTelemetry workloads.
• Approach: Split hot (recent) and cold (S3) storage; implement YAML-based ETL jobs to move aggregated partitions to cold storage with external dictionaries for lookups.
• KPIs: Storage $/GB, query latency, recovery time after node loss.

Datasets & tools to pull into projects

• TPC-H and TPC-DS (benchmarks you can parameterize for scale factor) — ideal baseline for OLAP queries.
• GitHub Archive, Stack Exchange dumps, Wikipedia pageviews for real-world high-cardinality joins.
• NYC Taxi and other mobility datasets for spatio-temporal workloads.
• Kaggle public corpora for enrichment; synthetic generators (Faker + custom scripts) to scale cardinality.
• Kafka, Debezium for CDC ingestion; Flink/Beam for streaming transforms; ClickHouse Kafka engine for ingestion testing.
• Monitoring stack: Prometheus + Grafana + ClickHouse exporter; use system tables: system.metrics, system.events, system.parts.

Benchmarks: what to measure and how to present results

Benchmarks are the currency of your portfolio. Recruiters want to quickly see you can deliver under constraints. Provide reproducible scripts and a concise results page with graphs.

Essential metrics to include

• Ingestion rate: rows/sec sustained, spikes, backpressure recovery
• Query latency: p50, p95, p99 for representative queries
• Throughput: concurrent queries/sec and aggregate rows scanned/sec
• Resource usage: CPU, memory, disk IO, network (per node)
• Storage cost: $/GB per month with hot/cold split
• Failure behavior: node kill/recover tests, replication lag

How to run reproducible benchmarks

1. Provide a Docker Compose or k8s manifest that launches ClickHouse, Kafka, and monitoring tools.
2. Include a script to seed data and a load generator with configurable QPS and concurrency.
3. Automate metrics collection into a results folder and generate Grafana snapshots + CSV exports.
4. Publish raw output and a 1-page summary with charts and conclusions—don’t bury the results.

Schema and query patterns to demonstrate

Show you can pick the right engine and tune it. Include before/after comparisons that explain tradeoffs.

• MergeTree vs. Aggregating/SummingMergeTree: Explain when to pre-aggregate vs. query raw rows.
• ORDER BY choice: Show why ordering by (user_id, timestamp) improves range scans and reduces data read.
• Materialized views: Use them to build hot rollups for real-time dashboards, show write amplification and storage impact.
• Sampling and approximate algorithms: Use quantiles and HyperLogLog for expensive counts and percentiles.
• Distributed joins: Show broadcast vs. shuffle and present memory/performance tradeoffs.

Interview artifacts to include in your portfolio

Beyond code and benchmarks, practical artifacts help interviewers assess your thinking quickly.

• Architecture diagram: Simple SVG showing data flows, storage tiers, and failure domains.
• Runbook / Playbook: Steps for common incidents — node OOM, disk full, replication lag.
• CI pipeline: Tests that run small-scale benchmarks in PRs (GitHub Actions/Terraform plan).
• Incident postmortem: Short postmortem from your project run — what failed, why, and remediation.
• Query plan excerpts: EXPLAIN outputs with comments explaining why a plan is slow and how you fixed it.
• Cost analysis: Estimate monthly storage and compute for your dataset at 3 scale points (1TB, 10TB, 100TB).

How to tell the story during interviews

1. Start with a 30-second “elevator summary” (problem, scale, outcome): “I built a Kafka->ClickHouse pipeline ingesting 200k rows/sec with p95 rollup latency under 500ms; cost per month was $X.”
2. Walk through architecture diagram and highlight failure modes you tested.
3. Show the benchmark script and results; be ready to explain why one change (e.g., ORDER BY) reduced p95 by 3x.
4. Present a short postmortem: what went wrong in a stress test and the operational change that prevented recurrence.

Common pitfalls and how to avoid them

• Showing only small-scale demos: include a clear path to scale (scripts to change scale factors).
• Shadow testing (only synthetic single-node runs): run multi-node distributed tests and prove behavior under failure.
• Ignoring cost: provide realistic cloud cost estimates and justify architecture decisions on dollars and latency.
• Unreadable repos: add a concise README and one-click demo so interviewers can reproduce results quickly.

Advanced strategies that impress senior roles

• Backpressure & Flow Control: Implement Kafka consumer groups with adaptive batch sizes and show how you prevent OOM in peak ingestion.
• Adaptive Sharding: Demonstrate re-sharding strategies and a migration plan without downtime (use Distributed tables and TTL-based reimport approach).
• Cost-Performance Tradeoffs: Provide a matrix of query latency vs storage class (hot SSD vs cold S3-backed MergeTree with external storage).
• Observability as code: Grafana dashboards as JSON, Prometheus alerts, and SLOs defined in your repo.

Sample checklist to include in each project (publish in repo)

• README: setup, run, expected results
• Dataset sources + download scripts
• Schema DDL and justification for choices
• Load generator + benchmark scripts (configurable SF/concurrency)
• Monitoring dashboards (Grafana snapshots) and CSV results
• Cost analysis and postmortem

Note: In 2026 recruiters at analytics scaleups value depth over breadth. A single well-documented, reproducible project that demonstrates real operational understanding will beat five shallow demos.

Example mini-project roadmap (4 weeks)

1. Week 1: Choose dataset and draft architecture. Prepare Docker/k8s manifest to run ClickHouse + Kafka + Prometheus.
2. Week 2: Implement ingestion + initial schema. Add simple dashboards and run baseline benchmarks.
3. Week 3: Tune schema, add materialized views, implement TTL/cold storage. Run scale tests and failure scenarios.
4. Week 4: Polish docs, record a 3-minute demo video, write the postmortem and cost analysis, publish repo and blog post.

How to surface this work on your resume and LinkedIn

• Resume bullet (concise): “Built Kafka->ClickHouse pipeline ingesting 200k rows/sec; p95 query latency for 1-minute rollups <500ms; documented runbook and cost model.”
• LinkedIn: link to the repo + 1-min clip, and a 2-3 sentence highlight of impact.
• GitHub: pin the repo and include a short README banner with benchmark results and Grafana snapshot.

Final tips: how to prepare for the technical interview

• Be ready to discuss tradeoffs: why MERGETREE ORDER BY X vs Y, when to pre-aggregate, and cost implications.
• Memorize key ClickHouse monitoring tables (system.metrics, system.parts) and common system settings that affect memory and joins.
• Prepare two incident stories: one about performance tuning, one about recovery after failure.
• Practice explaining your benchmark methodology in 90 seconds: dataset, scale, load pattern, key results.

Resources and templates

• TPC-H/TPC-DS generators for synthetic scale testing
• ClickHouse official docs and GitHub examples for Kafka engine and Distributed tables
• Grafana dashboards and Prometheus exporters for ClickHouse (use as starting points)
• Sample GitHub repo structure: /infra, /loadgen, /ddl, /dashboards, /results, /doc

Concluding roadmap: From portfolio to offer

Follow this sequence and you'll move from curiosity to hireable evidence: pick one of the suggested projects, implement an end-to-end demo with reproducible benchmarks, and document outcomes with clear artifacts (runbook, cost analysis, postmortem). In 2026, scaleups like ClickHouse are hiring engineers who can prove they understand both OLAP theory and the messy operational realities of production systems. Your portfolio is your proof — make it reproducible, measurable, and story-driven.

Ready to build the portfolio that gets you hired? Start with the 4-week roadmap above, publish a reproducible repo with one-click demos, and include the benchmark summary page. If you want a checklist or a portfolio review, click through to download our interview artifact templates and benchmark scripts.

Call-to-action

Publish one polished project this month. Need help choosing which project matches your role target? Submit your resume and project idea for a free 15-minute portfolio triage at techsjobs.com/portfolio-review and get actionable feedback tailored to ClickHouse and analytics scaleups.

Related Reading

• Dinner by Color: How a Smart RGBIC Lamp Can Inspire Seasonal Menus
• How a Supercharged Economy Could Make 2026 the Busiest Travel-Weather Year Yet
• When to Sprint and When to Marathon Your Martech Adoption: A Roadmap for Brokerages
• The New Era of Broadcast Partnerships: What a BBC‑YouTube Model Could Mean for Rights and Accessibility
• Tax Efficient Structuring for All-Cash Buyouts: What Small Business Owners Need to Know